Abstract. The article is devoted to the study of the structure of land use in the transboundary basin of the Tumannaya River. The map of land use within the Tumannaya River basin was compiled using remote sensing data. According to the basin approach, the territory was divided into the tributary basins of the first, second and third order using the ArcGIS software suite – a total of 21. The mapping results were analyzed by means of mathematical methods and quantitative techniques. The ecological and economic state of the transboundary basin has been found to have a low level of tension. The ecological and economic state of the floodplain is less balanced, for which low values of the natural protection coefficient have been identified. The minimum value of this coefficient is typical for the DPRK territory. The entropic measure of complexity and its derivatives as well as the Margalef index are more informative among the quantitative indicators. The floodplain parts of the basin within the PRC and the DPRK also have high values for most of the complexity indicators. Unlike the peripheral parts of the basin, they are more susceptible to anthropogenic effect. The Russian territory of the basin is the smallest in terms of the area, with less diversity in types of land use and greater fragmentation.

For citation: Maslova M.N. Quantitative analysis of the ecological and economic balance and the structure of land use in the basin of the Tumannaya River. Geosistemy perehodnykh zon = Geosystems of Transition Zones, 2023, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 316–330. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
https://doi.org/10.30730/gtrz.2023.7.3.316-330, https://www.elibrary.ru/kfayqb

1. Tishchenko P.Ya., Semkin P.Yu., Pavlova G.Yu., Tishchenko P.P., Lobanov V.B., Marjash A.A., Mikhailik T.A., Sagalaev S.G., Sergeev A.F., Tibenko E.Yu. et al. 2018. Hydrochemistry of the Tumen River estuary, Sea of Japan. Oceanology, 58(2): 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437018010149

2. Korytny L.M. 2017. Basin concept: from hydrology to nature management. Geography and Natural Resources, 38(2): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1875372817020019

3. Baklanov P.Ya., Ganzey S.S. 2008. Trans-boundary territories: the problems of sustainable nature use. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 216 p. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.studmed.ru/baklanov-pya-ganzey-ss-transgranichnye-territorii-problemy-ustoychivogo-prirodopolzovaniya_2fc359a8068.html

4. Kashirskaya A.V. 2014. [The role of the Russian Far East in the regional cooperation of the countries of Northeast Asia]. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie = Terra Humania, 2: 65–69. (In Russ.).

5. Baklanov P.Ya., Ganzey S.S., Kachur A.N. (Eds) 2002. [ Transboundary diagnostic analysis: Tumen River Strategic Action Program (RAS/98/G31. United Nations Development Program. Global Environment Facility Foundation) ]. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 231 p. (In Russ.).

6. Nikolaev V.A. 2006. [ Landscape science: Seminars and practical classes]. Moscow: Faculty of Geography of Moscow State University, 208 p. (In Russ.).

7. Maslova M.N. 2022. Structure of land use in the Tumannaya river basin. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Advances in Current Natural Sciences, 8: 52–58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/use.37868

8. Kochurov B.I. 1999. [ Geoecology: ecodiagnostics and ecological and economic balance of the territory ]. Smolensk: SGU Publ., 154 p. (In Russ.).

9. Viktorov A.S. 1986. [ Landscape pattern ]. Moscow: Mysl', 177 p. (In Russ.).

10. Margalef R. 1992. [ The appearance of the biosphere ]. Moscow: Nauka, 215 p. (In Russ.).

11. Puzachenko Yu.G. 2004. [ Mathematical methods in ecological and geographical research ]. Moscow: Academia, 407 p. (In Russ.).

12. Sokolov A.S. 2014. Landscape diversity: theoretical bases, approaches and studying methods. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov = Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of Regions, 10(1): 208–213. (In Russ.).

13. Gerenchuk K.I., Gorash I.K., Topchiev A.G. 1969. [Methods for determining some parameters of the morphological structure of landscapes]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Geography Series, 5: 102–109. (In Russ.).

14. Plyusnin V.M. 2003. Landscape analysis of mountain areas. Irkutsk: Publ. House of the Institute of Geography SB RAS, 257 p. (In Russ.). EDN: TBAJKP

15. Puzachenko Yu.G., D'yakonov K.N., Aleshchenko G.M. 2002. [Landscape diversity and methods of its measurement]. In: Geography and monitoring of biodiversity. Moscow: NUMC: 76–163. (In Russ.).

16. Pozachenyuk E.A., Agienko A.A. 2017. Assessment of the landscape diversity of Alushta amphitheater. Uchyonye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Geografiya. Geologiya. = Scientific notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Geography. Geology, 3(69), no. 2: 102–116. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-landshaftnogo-raznoobraziya-alushtinskogo-amfiteatra/viewer

17. Chernykh D.V. 2011. Quantitative assessment of complexity and landscape diversity of the Russian Altai. Izvestiya of Altai State University, 3-2(71): 60–65. (In Russ.).