Geosistemy perehodnykh zon = Geosystems of Transition Zones / Геосистемы переходных зон
Content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

2021, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 378–388

URL: http://journal.imgg.ru/archive.html, https://elibrary.ru/title_about.asp?id=64191, https://doi.org/10.30730/gtrz.2021.5.4.378-388


Mechanisms of plastic microparticles retention by buffer zones with macrophytes
Vasily D. Kazmiruk, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-174X, kazm@iwp.ru
Water Problems Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Abstract PDF ENG Резюме PDF RUS Full text PDF RUS

Abstract. Environmental pollution by resistant to degradation microparticles of synthetic polymer materials (microplastics) is one of the growing global problems nowadays. At the same time, research on the behavior of plastic microparticles in the environment is only at an early stage, as well as the development of methods for preventing and regulating microplastic contamination of water bodies. For the first time in world scientific practice, the author proposed to use the barrier role of macrophytes for these purposes. А number of mechanisms directly and indirectly leading to the microplastic retention by macrophytes have been identified based on field and laboratory experiments with plastic microparticles with different polymer matrix (polyethylene, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyester) and air-water and immersed vegetation, as well as plants with leaves floating on the water surface. According to the predominance of a particular physical process, these mechanisms can be combined into four groups: (1) The appearance of additional resistance to the movement of water and air masses. Change in the kinematic structure of water and air flows promotes slowing down the movement of microparticles, their sedimentation and retention by plants; (2) Decreasing the kinetic energy of wind waves and raindrops by thickets of macrophytes prevents repeated movement of already trapped microparticles; (3) Mechanical retention of plastic microparticles occurs as a result of the existence of irregularities in the structure of plants, sieve-like structures made of interweaving of stems and leaves, the bulk of plant litter, adhesion of plant surfaces and microparticles, which is enhanced by the sticky surfaces of the periphyton; (4) The attraction and adhesion of plastic microparticles to plants and to each other occurs as a result of the interaction of electric fields.


Keywords:
microplastics, macrophytes, contamination, water body, microparticle retention

For citation: Kazmiruk V.D. Mechanisms of plastic microparticles retention by buffer zones with macrophytes. Geosistemy perehodnykh zon = Geosystems of Transition Zones, 2021, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 378–388. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
https://doi.org/10.30730/gtrz.2021.5.4.378-388

Для цитирования: Казмирук В.Д. Механизмы перехвата пластиковых микрочастиц буферными зонами из макрофитов. Геосистемы переходных зон, 2021, т. 5, № 4, с. 378–388.
https://doi.org/10.30730/gtrz.2021.5.4.378-388


References

1. Kazmiruk V.D. 1990. Hydraulic resistances of higher aquatic vegetation. Vodnye resursy, 17(1): 101–108. (In Russ.).

2. Kazmiruk V.D. 2020. Mikroplastik v okruzhayushchey srede: Narastayushchaya problema planetarnogo masshtaba [Microplastics in the environment: the growing problem of a planetary scale ]. Moscow: URSS, 432 p. (In Russ.).

3. Kazmiruk V.D. 2021. The barrier role of macrophytes in pollution of water bodies with microplastics. Science. Innovations. Technologies , 3: 133–149. (In Russ.)

4. Kazmiruk V.D., Kazmiruk T.N., Brekhovskikh V.F. 2004. Overgrown streams and reservoirs: Dynamic processes of formation of bottom sediments . Moscow: Nauka Press, 310 p. (In Russ.).

5. Bai Z., Wang N., Wang M. 2021. Effects of microplastics on marine copepods. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 217: 112243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112243

6. Chen S., Sanfod L.P., Koch E.W., Shi F., North E.W. 2007. A nearshore model to investigate the effects of seagrass bed geometry on wave attenuation and suspended sediment transport. Estuaries and Coasts , 30(2): 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02700172

7. Di M., Liu L., Wang W., Wang J. 2019. Manuscript prepared for submission to environmental toxicology and pharmacology pollution in drinking water source areas: Microplastics in the Danjiangkou Reservoir, China. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology , 65: 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2018.12.009

8. Eitzen L., Paul S., Braun U., Altmann K., Jekel M., Ruhl A.S. 2019. The challenge in preparing particle suspensions for aquatic microplastic research. Environmental Research, 168: 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.008

9. Esiukova E.E., Lobchuk O.I., Volodina A.A., Chubarenko I.P. 2021. Marine macrophytes retain microplastics. Marine Pollution Bull. , 171: 112738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112738

10. Goss H., Jaskiel J., Rotjan R. 2018. Thalassia testudinum as a potential vector for incorporating microplastics into benthic marine food webs. Marine Pollution Bull. , 135: 1085–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.08.024

11. Horvath T.G. 2004. Retention of particulate matter by macrophytes in a first-order stream. Aquatic Botany , 78(1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2003.09.003

12. Jones K.L., Hartl M.G.J., Bell M.C., Capper A. 2020. Microplastic accumulation in a Zostera marina L. bed at Deerness Sound, Orkney, Scotland. Marine Pollution Bull., 152: 110883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110883

13. Kalćĺková G. 2020. Aquatic vascular plants – A forgotten piece of nature in microplastic research. Environmental Pollution , 262: 114354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114354

14. Kukkola A., Krause S., Lynch I., Sambrook Smith G.H., Nel H. 2021. Nano and microplastic interactions with freshwater biota – Current knowledge, challenges and future solutions. Environment International, 152: 106504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106504

15. Luther M.E., Leonard L.A. 1995. Flow hydrodynamics in tidal marsh canopies. Limnology and Oceanography, 40(8): 1474–1484. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1995.40.8.1474

16. Quartet S., Kroo’n A., Augustinus P.G.E.F., Van Santen P., Tri N.H.J. 2007. Wave attenuation in coastal mangroves in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. Asian Earth Science , 29(4): 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.05.008

17. Santos C.B., de los, Krång A.-S., Infantes E. 2021. Microplastic retention by marine vegetated canopies: Simulations with seagrass meadows in a hydraulic flume. Environmental Pollution, 269: 116050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116050

18. Sendra M., Sparaventi E., Novoa B., Figuera A. 2021. An overview of the internalization and effects of microplastics and nanoplastics as pollutants of emerging concern in bivalves. Science of the Total Environment, 753: 142024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142024

19. Stead J.L., Cundy A.B., Hudson M.D., Thompson Ch.E.L., Williams I.D., Russell A.E., Pabortsava K. 2020. Identification of tidal trapping of microplastics in a temperate salt marsh system using sea surface microlayer sampling. Scientific Reports, 10: 14147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70306-5