Geosistemy perehodnykh zon = Geosystems of Transition Zones / Ãåîñèñòåìû ïåðåõîäíûõ çîí
Content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 196–205

URL: http://journal.imgg.ru/archive.html, https://elibrary.ru/title_about.asp?id=64191, https://doi.org/10.30730/gtrz.2023.7.2.196-205, https://www.elibrary.ru/yucbey


Ecological and economic balance evaluation of Peter the Great Gulf basin (Sea of Japan)
Tatiana K. Muzychenko, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8858-5979, mtk1998@yandex.ru
Pacific Geographical Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of RAS, Vladivostok, Russia
Abstract PDF ENG Ðåçþìå PDF RUS Full text PDF RUS

Abstract. This work analyzes the indicators of ecological and economic balance within the basin of Peter the Great Gulf. The need for this study is due to the fact, that environmental conditions in the basin are greatly affected by the ongoing process of infrastructural and economic development. The aforementioned processes are characterized by unevenness in their spatial distribution. A map that demonstrates the spatial distribution of 10 land use classes (built-up areas, quarries, rice/paddy fields, agricultural lands, unutilized agricultural lands, unutilized rice/paddy fields, grasslands, shrublands, forests and water bodies) of the area of interest has been compiled using satellite imagery as of 2022. The ecological and economic balance of the basin, which was subdivided into 20 smaller river basins, has been evaluated. Each land use class was assigned to a category representing the intensity of anthropogenic impact. Ecological and economic balance indicators – absolute tension, relative tension, natural protectiveness indices and total area of land with resource-stabilizing properties – were calculated. The balance between the natural potential and economic development was found to be maintained in the study area as a whole, albeit with a few exceptions such as the Pervaya Rechka and Bogataya river basins which host the most intense human impact in the basin. Minimum human influence on the natural potential can be observed in the southwest of the basin (basins of the Bolotnaya, Tesnaya, Tsukanovka, Gladkaya, Ryazanovka, Poyma, Brusya, Narva, Barabashevka, Amba rivers).


Keywords:
Peter the Great Gulf, basin approach, ecological and economic balance, anthropogenic impact, absolute and relative tension indices, natural protectiveness index

For citation: Muzychenko T.K. Ecological and economic balance evaluation of Peter the Great Gulf basin (Sea of Japan). Geosistemy perehodnykh zon = Geosystems of Transition Zones, 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 196–205. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
https://doi.org/10.30730/gtrz.2023.7.2.196-205, https://www.elibrary.ru/yucbey


References

1. Korytny L.M. 2017. The basin concept: from hydrology to nature management. Geography and Natural Resources, 38(2): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372817020019

2. Rogov V.Yu., Bagaynikov M.L. 2020. Pool approach to the formation of institutions of economic development of the region (applicable to the Baikal region). Bulletin of ZabGU = Transbaikal State University Journal, 26(5): 106–117. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-5-106-117

3. Horton R.E. 1948. [ Erosion development of rivers and catchment areas ]. Leningrad: Inostr. Lit., 156 p. (In Russ.).

4. Sochava V.B. 1978. [ Introduction to geosystem studies ]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 320 p. (In Russ.).

5. Lvovich M.I. 1963. [ Man and waters. Conversion of water balance and river runoff ]. Ìoscow: Gos. Izd-vo geogr. lit., 568 p. (In Russ.).

6. Koronkevich N.I. 2003. [Transboundary hydrological transfer in CIS countries]. In: Transgranichnye problemy SNG. Moscow: Opus, p. 22–31. (In Russ.).

7. Subbotin A.I., Dygalo V.S. 1991. [ Experimental hydrological studies in the Moscow River basin ]. Moscow: Gidrometeoizdat, 262 p. (In Russ.).

8. Ganzey S.S. 2004. [ Transboundary Geosystems of the South of the Russian Far East and the Northeast of China ]. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 231 p. (In Russ.).

9. Baklanov P.Ya. 2018. Structural features and potential of border and transboundary areas development: theoretical aspects. Regionalnye issledovaniya, 3(61): 19–24. (In Russ.). EDN: YRSDJR

10. Kochurov B.I. 1999. [ Geoecology: ecodiagnostics, ecological and economical balance of the territory ]. Smolensk: SGU, 154 p. (In Russ.).

11. Mani-Perez C., Xavier L.Y., Santos C.R., Turra A. 2016. Stakeholders’ perceptions of local environmental changes as a tool for impact assessment in coastal zones. Ocean & Coastal Management, 119: 135–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.10.005

12. Minnikov I.V., Kurolap S.A. 2013. Assessment of ecological and economic balance in the Voronezh Oblast. Vestnik VGU = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoecogiya, 1: 129–136. (In Russ.). EDN: QYPDGF

13. Bodrova V.N. 2013. Calculation and evaluation of ecological and economic balance of the Volgograd Region in geographical information system. Problemy regionalnoy ecologii = Regional Environmental Issues , 2: 43–50. (In Russ.). EDN: QBZEPX

14. Merkulov P.I., Merkulova S.V., Varfolomeev A.F. 2008. [Geoecological aspects of the land use structure research in Mordovia Republic]. Inzhenernye tekhnologii I sistemy = Engineering Technologies and Systems, 18(1): 123–130. (In Russ.). EDN: SZCTRN

15. Ulengov R.A., Urazmetov I.A. 2013. [Approaches to geoecological evaluation of Tatarstan Republic geosystems]. Sovremennye problemy nauki I obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education, 1(443): 140–147. (In Russ.). EDN: PWBDHV

16. Panchenko E.M., Dyukarev A.G. 2015. Assessment of ecological and economical balance of the territory of Ob-Tom interfluve considering anthropogenic load. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov = Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 326(12): 87–95. (In Russ.). EDN: VUSPCD

17. Chupikova S.A., Oydup T.M., Mongush B.S. 2020. GIS analysis of ecological and economic balance for kozhuuns of the Republic of Tyva. Prirodnye resursy, sreda I obshchestvo = Natural resources, environment and society, 3(7): 59–67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-4441-2020-10028

18. Karpova L.A. 2016. Mapping evaluation indicators environmental and economic balance using GIS technology. Vestnik SGUGIT = Vestnik of SSUGT, 4(36): 122–135. (In Russ.). EDN: XQYXOJ

19. Egidarev E.G., Bazarov K.Yu., Mishina N.V. 2019. Current land use in the Khanka Lake basin. In: Geosystems of Northeast Asia: the peculiarities of their spatial-temporal structures, zoning of land and waters: coll. scientific articles. Vladivostok: Pacific Geographical Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of RAS, p. 197–203. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.spsl.nsc.ru/FullText/konfe/geosystems_2019.pdf (accessed 16.06.2023).

20. Nikolaev V.A. 2006. [ Landscape science: Seminars and practical classes ]. Moscow: Geograficheskiy fakultet MGU, 208 p. (In Russ.).

21. Muzychenko Ò.Ê. 2022. Spatial analysis of land use of the Peter the Great Gulf basin. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Advances in current natural sciences, 10: 58–63. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/use.37908